USPTO Withdraws Proposed Changes to Terminal Disclaimer Practice
Recent Publications
Latest Case Decisions Affecting Patent Licenses in U.S., Europe and Japan
Les Nouvelles - Licensing Executives Society International (LESI)
Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.
1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.
Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.
Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.
From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.
Les Nouvelles - Licensing Executives Society International (LESI)
November 11, 2024
October 9-10, 2024 in Tokyo and Osaka
October 1 and 3, 2024
Further to our article of May 13, 2024 (here), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced on December 4, 2024, that it is withdrawing the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published in the Federal Register on May 10, 2024. According to the USPTO, "In light of resource constraints, the USPTO has decided not to move forward with the proposed rule at this time and to withdraw the proposed rule. Despite the decision not to move forward with the proposed rule at this time, the USPTO appreciates and takes seriously the thoughtful perspectives raised by commenters."
Recall that the proposed rule sought to require that a Terminal Disclaimer include a provision stipulating that the patent will be unenforceable if it is linked directly or indirectly to another patent whose claims have been invalidated due to prior art. This raised valid concerns that filing a Terminal Disclaimer would entail a risk that the enforceability of an entire patent could depend on the validity of a single claim in another patent.
Many patent applicants and owners will welcome the withdrawal of this proposed rule. At least for now, current practice remains, where claims are typically assessed individually even within a single patent.
The USPTO’s announcement is available here: Federal Register
Les Nouvelles - Licensing Executives Society International (LESI)