the firm's post-grant practitioners are some of the most experienced in the country.

Technologies

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Digital Health
Digital Health
Energy & Renewables
Energy & Renewables

Fast Facts

About Our

Law Firm

About Our Law Firm

Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.

Get to know our

History

Get to know our History

1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.

Our Local and

Global Reach

Our Local and Global Reach

Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.

A few of our

ACCOLADES

A few of our ACCOLADES

Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR

Career

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR Career

From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.

A few ways to

GET In Touch

A few ways to GET In Touch
US Office

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Learn More +


Tokyo Office

Telephone: +81-3-6212-0550
Learn More +

Downloadable

Patent Forms

Downloadable Patent Forms

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.

Stay informed with

Our Blogs

Two Strikes and You're Out: Copyright Protection Denied to Aqua Creations for Chandelier Designs

  • April 11, 2011
  • Blog Post

Associated Practices


Aqua Creations USA Inc. and Aqua Creations LTD ("Aqua Creations") sued Hilton Hotels Corporation ("Hilton Hotels"), asserting that Hilton Hotels appropriated Aqua Creations' chandelier designs.

It was a bit of an uphill battle because the Copyright Office already refused registration of the designs. Unfortunately for Aqua Creations, the Court agreed with the Copyright Office that the designs were not copyrightable and the case was dismissed. A possible alternative approach for Aqua Creations may have been to obtain a design patent--if the timing was right.

Discussion

Generally, to bring a federal copyright infringement claim, a Plaintiff must already own a valid copyright registration for the alleged infringed article. However, where the Copyright Office has refused registration, an unsuccessful copyright applicant may bring an infringement action and the courts will make an independent determination as to copyrightability. In this case, following a line of cases beginning with a 1954 Supreme Court decision, the Court confirmed that unless the creative elements in a “useful article” can be separated from the useful elements, the creative elements are not copyrightable. Thus, just as the Copyright Office had denied copyright, so too the Court held the chandelier designs were not copyrightable and Aqua Creations’ case was dismissed.

Resources