Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.
1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.
Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.
Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.
From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.
Les Nouvelles - Licensing Executives Society International (LESI)
For Immediate Release March 11, 2008 Alexandria, Va. -- The intellectual property law firm Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., has obtained 3,423 U.S. utility patents issued in 2007, maintaining the top spot among patent firms for obtaining patents for the 17th year.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 19, 2008 Alexandria, Va. – An International Trade Commission (ITC) judge has ruled against a Colorado-based company regarding its claims that SMC Corporation and SMC Corporation of America violated 19 U.S.C. Section 1337 with unfair practices in import trade.
For Immediate Release (January 17, 2008) Alexandria, Va. - The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office found in favor of technology company Convolve Inc. and against Seagate Technology Inc.
Beginning in 1968, a team of innovative attorneys set about laying the foundation of this great Firm, which has since grown to become one of the largest in the United States specializing exclusively in intellectual property law. The focus then, as now, was the delivery of top-notch client service.
For Immediate Release
For Immediate Release (December 18, 2007) Alexandria, Va. – Norman F. Oblon, senior partner with Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., has been named by Virginia Business magazine as among The Legal Elite 2007 in the Intellectual Property category.
For Immediate Release (October 5, 2007) Alexandria, Va. – Gerald J. Mossinghoff, senior counsel with Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., has been selected for the IP Hall of Fame 2007, which honors a select group of individuals worldwide who have played a major role in the creation of today's IP system. This year, Mr. Mossinghoff is one of nine prominent members of the global IP community to be inducted.
For Immediate Release Alexandria, Va. – Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. is pleased to announce that Dr. Yorikatsu Hohokabe has joined the firm as a Senior Technical Advisor in the firm's Chemical and Biotechnology Practice Group. Dr. Hohokabe is a former Senior Advisor to the Showa Denko K.K. Corporation, a diversified group of manufacturing companies, active in personal care products, environmental goods, automotive parts and electronics.
There has been an important development at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB"). On August 1, 2007, the TTAB published its long-awaited "Miscellaneous Changes to Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Rules", which amend the Trademark Rules of Practice before the TTAB (PDF copy attached). This package of rules follows the February 2006 proposed rules, which generated much concern and debate amongst trademark practitioners in the U.S.
For Immediate Release July 2007 Alexandria, Va. – The U.S. Court Of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has affirmed the Massachusetts district court's judgment in favor of SMC Corp. of lack of infringement of Festo Corporation's U.S. Patent No. 4,354,125. The July 5, 2007 ruling determined that prosecution history estoppel applied because Festo failed to rebut the Supreme Court's presumption that SMC's accused equivalent was foreseeable. This nearly 20-year long landmark patent infringement dispute between SMC and Festo included two Supreme Court and five Federal Circuit decisions, two of which were en banc.