the firm's post-grant practitioners are some of the most experienced in the country.

Technologies

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Digital Health
Digital Health
Energy & Renewables
Energy & Renewables

Fast Facts

About Our

Law Firm

About Our Law Firm

Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.

Get to know our

History

Get to know our History

1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.

Our Local and

Global Reach

Our Local and Global Reach

Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.

A few of our

ACCOLADES

A few of our ACCOLADES

Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR

Career

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR Career

From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.

A few ways to

GET In Touch

A few ways to GET In Touch
US Office

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Learn More +


Tokyo Office

Telephone: +81-3-6212-0550
Learn More +

Downloadable

Patent Forms

Downloadable Patent Forms

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.

Stay informed with

Our Blogs

FDA Seeking Comments on Orange Book Patent Listing

  • June 29, 2020
  • Article

Associated People

Associated Technologies


The FDA has published a public notice requesting comments on the submission and listing of patent information. See the notice here. The information requested could lead to the implementation of changes having a significant impact on pharma, including combination products in the future, especially on combination products.

The FDA Has 5 categories of questions:

1. General Questions: including whether the FDA should clarify the types of patent that may be listed. This may be a reaction to the decision in In re: Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, No. 18-2086, D. Mass. February 13, 2020, where the court found that an antitrust action may be based on an improperly listed patent on a syringe component where the patent nor its claims identified any specific drug. See https://www.lifesciencesipblog.com/listing-the-medical-device-part-of-a-combination-product-in-the-orange-book-may-trigger-antitrust-liability-

2.     Drug Product Patents: including what factors should FDA consider in providing any clarifications related to whether device-related patents need to be submitted for listing as a patent that claims the drug? An example is, “what are the advantages and disadvantages of requiring patents that claim a device constituent part of a combination product approved under section 505 of the FD&C Act to also claim and/or disclose the active ingredient or formulation of the approved drug product (or the drug product class) to fall within the type of patent information that is required to be submitted to FDA for listing in the Orange Book?

3.     Method-of-Use Patents: Primarily directed at combination products where the claims are directed to using a device to administer the drug. Of interest is the question:

What information should FDA consider regarding whether there are circumstances in which a method-of-use patent claiming the way an approved drug product is administered that is not described in FDA-approved product labeling would meet the statutory standard for listing in the Orange Book?

4.     REMS-Related Patents [require a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy]: The agency is particularly interest in the impact of listing such patents in the Orange Book on the development of generic versions.

5.     Patents for Digital Applications: Primarily seeking input on the factors should be considered in determining whether a patent that claims an aspect of that digital application meets the standards for listing in the Orange Book?

Whether these inquiries will result in any FDA rule making remains to be seen. Depending on what the FDA decides could have a significant impact on Pharma life cycle strategies. Industry has been seeking answers to these question since 2002. It appears that the FDA is now advancing down the path to providing some clarity.