the firm's post-grant practitioners are some of the most experienced in the country.

Technologies

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Digital Health
Digital Health
Energy & Renewables
Energy & Renewables

Fast Facts

About Our

Law Firm

About Our Law Firm

Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.

Get to know our

History

Get to know our History

1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.

Our Local and

Global Reach

Our Local and Global Reach

Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.

A few of our

ACCOLADES

A few of our ACCOLADES

Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR

Career

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR Career

From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.

A few ways to

GET In Touch

A few ways to GET In Touch
US Office

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Learn More +


Tokyo Office

Telephone: +81-3-6212-0550
Learn More +

Downloadable

Patent Forms

Downloadable Patent Forms

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.

Stay informed with

Our Blogs

Delaware District Court Finds Exceptional Case Based on Plaintiff's Opposition To Alice Motion

  • March 22, 2019
  • Article

Associated Practices


On March 18, 2019, the court in Finnavations LLC v. Payoneer, Inc., No. 1-18-cv-00444, Dkt. No. 35 (D. Del. Mar. 18, 2019) granted defendants’ motion for exceptional case and awarded defendants attorneys’ fees. Typically, courts grant exceptional case motions against plaintiffs based on litigation misconduct or clearly unreasonable or unfounded infringement positions. The opinion in Finnavations is notable because the plaintiff’s exceptional behavior was based entirely in Finnavations’ opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss the case under 35 U.S.C. § 101. In other words, the court held that by defending the validity of its patent against defendants’ Alice motion, Finnavations acted objectively unreasonably.

The facts in Finnavations appear extreme: the patent examiner only allowed the asserted patent after rejecting its claims four times under section 101, the claims as issued are almost indistinguishable from the claims at issue in Alice, and Finnavations’ briefing was “not just mediocre or bad; it was ugly.” Opinion at 3, n.2. Based on these facts, Finnavations should have known before filing the case that the patent was likely to be invalidated under Alice. On the other hand, Finnavation’s patent was, like all patents, duly issued by the patent office and entitled to a presumption of validity. Based on the opinion, in some cases, asserting a patent with potential validity issues may be exception in and of itself, effectively rendering the patent unenforceable before it is litigated.

More broadly, the Finnavations opinion underscores the District of Delaware’s increased willingness in recent years to grant exceptional case motions. Once rare, exceptional case findings in Delaware after Octane Fitness are no longer uncommon. While the facts in most cases are not as unusual as Finnavations, potential plaintiffs in Delaware should be prepared for the real possibility of attorneys’ fees if they take litigation positions that could be considered vexatious or unusually weak.