the firm's post-grant practitioners are some of the most experienced in the country.

Teddy S. Gron
Stefan Uwe  Koschmieder, Ph.D.
Aristotelis M. Psitos
Dale M. Shaw
Erik M. Stang, Ph.D.
Eckhard H. Kuesters
Christopher I. Donahue
Kevin L. Hartman, Ph.D.
Jenchieh (Joseph) Yuan
Vincent K. Shier, Ph.D.
Jeffrey B. McIntyre
Nicholas  Rosa, Ph.D.
Bogdan A. Zinchenko
John F. Presper
Michael R. Casey, Ph.D.
Derek  Lightner, Ph.D.
Eric W. Schweibenz
Charles L. Gholz
Christopher  Ricciuti
Robert  Tarcu
Arthur I. Neustadt
Frank J. West
David M. Longo, Ph.D.
Craig R. Feinberg
Robert T. Pous
Akihiro  Yamazaki
Long  Phan, Ph.D.
Kasumi  Kanetaka
Maki  Saitoh
Richard D. Kelly
Jay E. Rowe, Jr., Ph.D.
Daniel J. Pereira, Ph.D.
Sameer  Gokhale
Aldo  Martinez
Kevin Ross  Davis
Diane  Jones
Peifang  Tian, Ph.D.
Tia D. Fenton
Ryan W. Smith
Marina I. Miller, Ph.D.
Norman F. Oblon
Brian B. Darville
John S. Kern
Jianping (James)  Wu
Yuanyi (Alex) Zhang
Andrew M. Ollis
Yuki  Onoe
Nanlin  Wang, Ph.D.
Robert W. Downs
Tao  Feng, Ph.D.
J. Derek  Mason, Ph.D., CLP
Yin Y. Nelson, Ph.D.
Yorikatsu  Hohokabe, Ph.D.
Kurt M. Berger, Ph.D.
Chika (Teranishi) Iitoyo
Philippe J.C. Signore, Ph.D.
Edwin D. Garlepp
Soumya  Panda
Elissa L. Sanford
Anna Z. Lloyd
Surinder  Sachar
Grace E. Kim
Steven B. Chang
Kevin M. McKinley
Stephen G. Baxter, Ph.D.
John  Sipos
Thomas M. Cunningham, Ph.D.
Matthew H. Everhart, Ph.D.
Colin B. Harris
Ching-Cheng (Tony)  Chang
Yanwen  Fei
Alexander B. Englehart
Alec M. Royka
Carl E. Schlier
James R. Love
Johnny  Ma

Technologies

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Digital Health
Digital Health
Energy & Renewables
Energy & Renewables

Fast Facts

About Our

Law Firm

About Our Law Firm

Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.

Get to know our

History

Get to know our History

1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.

Our Local and

Global Reach

Our Local and Global Reach

Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.

A few of our

ACCOLADES

A few of our ACCOLADES

Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR

Career

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR Career

From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.

A few ways to

GET In Touch

A few ways to GET In Touch
US Office

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Learn More +


Tokyo Office

Telephone: +81-3-6212-0550
Learn More +

Downloadable

Patent Forms

Downloadable Patent Forms

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.

Ajinomoto Delaware Litigation Heads Toward Victory with Patent Owner's Asserted Claims Found Indefinite In Claim Construction Ruling

  • July 2, 2020
  • Firm News

Associated Practices


Recently Judge Mitchell S. Goldberg for the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware approved and adopted Magistrate Judge Lloret’s Markman decision in its entirety, finding Plaintiff Kyowa Hakko Bio Co.’s (KHB) asserted patent claims invalid as indefinite. KHB had asserted infringement of its U.S. Patent RE45,723 allegedly covering an Ajinomoto process for manufacturing glutamic acid commonly used as an additive in food products.

The decision marks the end of a protracted claim construction period in the lawsuit.  As a result of Oblon’s work – one of the largest law firms in the U.S. focused exclusively on intellectual property law – Ajinomoto’s U.S. business ventures relating to glutamic acid will continue without interruption.

The decision also highlights that U.S. claim construction determinations can be confirmed by statements made to a foreign patent office.  According to Judge Goldberg, KHB’s statements at a foreign patent office constituted “blatant admissions” regarding the disputed claim term in the context of the same patent specification. 

Ajinomoto is represented by Oblon Partners Tia Fenton, Eric Schweibenz, and Stephen Baxter