the firm's post-grant practitioners are some of the most experienced in the country.

Technologies

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Digital Health
Digital Health
Energy & Renewables
Energy & Renewables

Fast Facts

About Our

Law Firm

About Our Law Firm

Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.

Get to know our

History

Get to know our History

1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.

Our Local and

Global Reach

Our Local and Global Reach

Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.

A few of our

ACCOLADES

A few of our ACCOLADES

Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR

Career

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR Career

From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.

A few ways to

GET In Touch

A few ways to GET In Touch
US Office

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Learn More +


Tokyo Office

Telephone: +81-3-6212-0550
Learn More +

Downloadable

Patent Forms

Downloadable Patent Forms

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.

Stay informed with

Our Blogs

USPTO Creates a Separate Design Patent Practitioner Bar

  • November 16, 2023
  • Firm News

Associated People


The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a final rule in the Federal Register on November 16, 2023, to create a separate design patent practitioner bar for practice in design patent proceedings only.

Importantly, according to the USPTO, the new design patent practitioner bar “does not impact the ability of those already registered to practice in any patent matters before the USPTO to continue to practice in any patent matters, including design patent matters, before the Office.” 

The USPTO acknowledged concerns in the practitioner community “that the division of the bar would cause confusion within the public, increase the cost of identifying appropriate counsel, add significant administrative and policing costs to the USPTO, and increase the risk of potential malpractice and ethical concerns.”  In response, the USPTO noted that “[c]onfusion by the public is avoided in part by allowing design patent practitioners to indicate their designation as a “design patent attorney” or “design patent agent,” and requiring such practitioners to indicate “design” when they are signing USPTO documents.”  The USPTO also indicated that to “ensure applicants to the design patent practitioner bar have the requisite knowledge of USPTO rules and regulations, the USPTO also requires them to take and pass the current registration examination” (in addition to undergoing and passing a moral character evaluation). 

Nevertheless, the USPTO emphasized that “admitted design patent practitioners may practice in design patent matters only” and reminded the patent community that per ethics Rule 11.101, “all practitioners, including design patent practitioners, are requested to provide competent representation to their clients.  This includes properly informing their clients of practice limitations.” 

According to the USPTO, “design patent practitioners will receive a particular registration number series to distinguish them from those practitioners who are authorized to practice in all patent matters.”  To further aid in making this distinction, the USPTO amended Rule 1.4(d)(1) to “to add the requirement that a design patent practitioner indicate their design patent practitioner status by placing the word “design” (in any format) adjacent to their handwritten signature” on documents filed with the Office.  The USPTO also amended Rule 1.4(d)(2)(ii) “to add the requirement that a design patent practitioner indicate their design patent practitioner status by placing the word “design” (in any format) adjacent to the last forward slash of their S-signature” on documents filed with the Office. 

However, the USPTO cautioned that practitioners must be careful when filing a Power of Attorney that names those practitioners that are associated with a USPTO Customer Number, noting that “[i]f a design practitioner is associated with a customer number, that customer number cannot be used to establish power of attorney in a utility or plant application. This applies even if a practitioner that is authorized to practice before the Office in all patent matters is also associated with that same customer number.”

Specific to design patent practitioners, the USPTO noted that “a registered practitioner under [Rule] 11.6(d) who is an attorney may use the designation “Design Patent Attorney”; and a registered practitioner under [Rule] 11.6(d) who is not an attorney (i.e., who is an agent) may use the designation “Design Patent Agent.””  However, a practitioner registered to practice in utility patent, design patent, and plant patent matters “who is an attorney may use the designation “Patents,” “Patent Attorney,” “Patent Lawyer,” “Registered Patent Attorney,” or a substantially similar designation; a registered practitioner under § 11.6(b) who is not an attorney may use the designation “Patents,” “Patent Agent,” “Registered Patent Agent,” or a substantially similar designation.”

Finally, according to the USPTO, “[e]xpanding the admission criteria of the patent bar encourages broader participation and keeps up with the ever-evolving technology and related teachings that qualify someone to practice before the USPTO. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure will be updated in accordance with this final rule in due course.”

The Notice is published in the Federal Register here:  https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-11-16/pdf/2023-25234.pdf

Resources