the firm's post-grant practitioners are some of the most experienced in the country.

Technologies

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Digital Health
Digital Health
Energy & Renewables
Energy & Renewables

Fast Facts

About Our

Law Firm

About Our Law Firm

Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.

Get to know our

History

Get to know our History

1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.

Our Local and

Global Reach

Our Local and Global Reach

Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.

A few of our

ACCOLADES

A few of our ACCOLADES

Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR

Career

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR Career

From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.

A few ways to

GET In Touch

A few ways to GET In Touch
US Office

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Learn More +


Tokyo Office

Telephone: +81-3-6212-0550
Learn More +

Downloadable

Patent Forms

Downloadable Patent Forms

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.

Stay informed with

Our Blogs

Microsoft v. i4i – Oral Argument Date Set

  • February 15, 2011
  • Blog Post

< p> The Supreme Court recently scheduled oral arguments in Microsoft v. i4i to take place on Monday, April 18. We previously reported the filing of petitioner Microsoft’s brief as well as several amicus briefs; i4i’s brief and amicus briefs supporting i4i remain forthcoming.

 

In this case, the Supreme Court must decide the standard of review that courts should apply when reviewing the validity of issued patents. Federal Circuit precedent requires clear and convincing evidence of patent invalidity to declare an issued patent invalid. Based on this standard, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court ruling in favor of the validity of i4i’s patent. Microsoft argues that this clear and convincing evidence standard is too onerous for determinations of patent validity, particularly where the challenge to validity involves prior art that was not before the USPTO during prosecution, as in this case. Instead, Microsoft would have the Supreme Court rule that a challenger need only show patent invalidity by a preponderance of the evidence.