Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.
1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.
Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.
Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.
From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.
April 28-30, 2024
November 16, 2023 - In-Person in Munich
October 27, 2023
In so arguing, the Department of Justice agreed with the ruling of the district court. Isolation or purity of DNA with naturally occurring nucleotide sequence, the Department of Justice argued, does not make that DNA into patentable subject matter. However, the Department of Justice arguments differed from the district court’s opinion in arguing for the patentability of manipulated genetic material, such as cDNA, vectors, recombinant plasmids, and chimeric proteins.
In arguing against patentability of unmodified genomic DNA, the Department of Justice acknowledged that it ran contrary to accepted practices of both the USPTO in admitting such subject matter and of the NIH and other governmental entities in seeking patents on such subject matter.
If these Department of Justice arguments are accepted by the Federal Circuit in its opinion or by the USPTO in its policies, biotechnology innovators will not be able to obtain patent protection for specific sequences of DNA by merely isolating or purifying it. To qualify as patentable subject matter, according to these arguments, genetic material must be the product of “scientists’ manipulation of the natural laws of genetics.”