the firm's post-grant practitioners are some of the most experienced in the country.

Technologies

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Digital Health
Digital Health
Energy & Renewables
Energy & Renewables

Fast Facts

About Our

Law Firm

About Our Law Firm

Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.

Get to know our

History

Get to know our History

1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.

Our Local and

Global Reach

Our Local and Global Reach

Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.

A few of our

ACCOLADES

A few of our ACCOLADES

Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR

Career

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR Career

From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.

A few ways to

GET In Touch

A few ways to GET In Touch
US Office

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Learn More +


Tokyo Office

Telephone: +81-3-6212-0550
Learn More +

Downloadable

Patent Forms

Downloadable Patent Forms

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.

Stay informed with

Our Blogs

The U.S. Teams Up with the Native Americans Against Pro-Football, Inc.

  • January 13, 2015
  • Blog Post

Associated Practices


The U.S. Teams Up with the Native Americans Against Pro-Football, Inc.

A Notice of Intervention was filed on January 9, 2015 by the Solicitor General to defend the constitutionality of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a). 

The U.S. Teams Up with the Native Americans Against Pro-Football, Inc.
A Notice of Intervention was filed on January 9, 2015 by the Solicitor General to defend the constitutionality of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a).   
Pro-Football, Inc. asserted in its complaint that Section 2(a) violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  Section (2) a states in pertinent part: 
No trademark by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others shall be refused registration on the principal register on account of its nature unless it—
(a) Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute…
As explained in the Notice of Intervention, inasmuch as Pro-Football, Inc.” provided notice of its challenge to the constitutionality of the Lanham Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2403(2) unconditionally allows the United States to intervene to defend the constitutionality of the Act.”  This is welcome news to the Native American Defendants, whose Motion to Dismiss the Appeal was denied on November 25, 2014.The U.S. Teams Up with the Native Americans Against Pro-Football, Inc.The U.S. Teams Up with the Native Americans Against Pro-Football, Inc.A Notice of Intervention was filed on January 9, 2015 by the Solicitor General to defend the constitutionality of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a).   

Pro-Football, Inc. asserted in its complaint that Section 2(a) violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  Section (2) a states in pertinent part:

No trademark by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others shall be refused registration on the principal register on account of its nature unless it—(a) Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute…

As explained in the Notice of Intervention, inasmuch as Pro-Football, Inc.” provided notice of its challenge to the constitutionality of the Lanham Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2403(2) unconditionally allows the United States to intervene to defend the constitutionality of the Act.”  This is welcome news to the Native American Defendants, whose Motion to Dismiss the Appeal was denied on November 25, 2014.  

Resources