Scott A. McKeown
Partner
Tel (703) 412-6297

Scott A. McKeown

Partner

SCOTT A. McKEOWN is a member of the firm's Management Committee, and co-chairs the Post Grant Patent practice group focusing on post-grant counseling, litigation and related prosecution issues. He leads the Post Grant Patent team responsible for electronics, wireless communications, software and computer-related inventions and business methods.

Mr. McKeown handles all aspects of post-issuance proceedings at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) including patent reissue and reexamination proceedings, post grant patent trials, and appeals to the Court Of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He offers his clients comprehensive post-grant patent counseling including advice on USPTO post grant proceedings concurrent with complex International Trade Commission (ITC) and district court litigations.

Having successfully navigated USPTO post grant patent proceedings in which more than half a billion dollars was at stake, Mr. McKeown is one of the preeminent post grant practitioners in the United States. He is lead post grant counsel to some of the largest corporations in the world.

Mr. McKeown has been identified by Intellectual Asset Management as a “thought leader” and one of the world’s leading patent practitioners for adversarial post-grant USPTO patent proceedings. In addition, the Legal 500 has identified Mr. McKeown as a recommended patent attorney.

Mr. McKeown is the editor of the firm's Patents Post-Grant blog, regularly contributing insights and commentary on USPTO post-grant patent proceedings, trends, practice tips and news. He lectures and writes extensively on post-grant proceedings at the USPTO and is a member of the teaching faculty of the Practicing Law Institute (PLI). Currently, Mr. McKeown is the Chair of the American Bar Association (ABA), Intellectual Property Law Section Committee 104 (Post Grant USPTO Proceedings).

A former electrical engineer, he has worked with a wide range of technologies, including computer software, wireless telecommunication protocols and network architectures, e-commerce applications, analog and digital signal processing, and consumer electronics. In the telecommunication arts, Mr. McKeown has worked extensively with IP routing and signaling protocols, ATM and wireless communication protocols. He also has a broad breadth of experience with OFDM systems, CDMA, TDMA, FSK, QAM and the 802.11 family of protocols.

In the consumer electronic arts, Mr. McKeown's practice has a strong focus in audio and video processing and display technologies, discs, signal compression and encoding schemes, recording medium formatting and construction, and many other related technologies.

Representative Matters

As lead patent reexamination counsel to Motorola Inc., successfully recovered significant patents of the company’s handheld device portfolio from patent reexamination. These patents are asserted against several competitors in concurrent litigation in the ITC and district courts.

As lead patent reexamination counsel to Eastman Kodak, responsible for recovering their electronic camera portfolio from patent reexamination. Concurrent litigation is pending in the ITC and district courts throughout the U.S.

As lead patent reexamination counsel to Good Technology, successfully recovered the patent portfolio from both ex parte & inter partes patent reexamination proceedings resulting in a favorable settlement of concurrent litigation with a competitor ($267.5 million).

Monday, April 04, 2011

Inter Partes Review, 5 Months to a First Action?

Friday, April 01, 2011

Additional Grounds for Challenging Patents in Proposed Post Grant Review Legislation

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Petition or Appeal?–Pursuit of SNQ Denial at the USPTO

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Ronald Katz & Sorenson Research Appeals Decided

Monday, March 28, 2011

USPTO Forced to Turn a Blind Eye to Support Issues in Patent Reexamination

Thursday, March 24, 2011

House to Introduce Modified Bill Early Next Week

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Patent Reexamination Cited in Government Brief to Supreme Court

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Additional Prosecution History Proves Crucial

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Expanded BPAI Panel Explains Acquiescence to Restriction Requirement is Not a Correctable Error

Monday, March 21, 2011

42% of 2007 Cases Remain Stayed