Blog

http://www.protectingdesigns.com/

Recent Blog Posts

  • Supreme Court Overturns Apple's $399MM Design Patent Infringement Award Against Samsung Today the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Apple's $399MM design patent infringment award against Samsung.  A copy of the slip opinion can be found here.  An in-depth post is to follow, so please check back soon. ... More
  • Justices Seem Unsatisfied With Design Patent Damages Tests The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Apple, Inc. on Oct. 11, as to the following question presented in Samsung’s cert petition: “Where a design patent is applied to only a component of a product, should an award of infringer’s profits be limited to those profits attributable to the component?”   The oral argument drifted between a discussion of how to apply a broad test to answer the question at issue and a discussion of... More
  • ITC Terminates Design Patent-Based 337 Investigation The International Trade Commission (ITC) recently terminated a Section 337 investigation, Certain Quartz Slabs and Portions Thereof (II) (Inv. No. 337-TA-1017), which involved U.S. Patent Nos. (1) D712,666; (2) D712,670; (3) D751,298; (4) D712,161; and (5) D737,058.    Discussed in detail on the Oblon ITC 337 Law Blog here and here, notably, the case involved the assertion of only design patents, the above-identified design patents, directed to quartz slabs.  Also, the Commission declined to send the case to the ITC's Early Disposition Pilot Program, because Respondents' request that the Commission... More
  • Samsung Files Brief In U.S. Supreme Court Regarding Apple Decision Samsung filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court on June 1, 2016 in response to the Court's grant of a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in December 2015. The petition sought a ruling on “where a patented design is applied only to a component of a product, should an award of infringer’s profits be limited to profits attributable to that component?”   This case is follow-on to Apple v. Samsung in 2012, which, generally speaking, included the U.S. District Court... More
  • BMW Group Files Suit Against TurboSquid Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, BMW of North America, LLC, Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Limited, and Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC (collectively “BMW Group”) filed suit against TurboSquid, Inc. (“TurboSquid”) on May 3, 2016 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging infringement of BMW Group’s design patents, trademarks, and trade dress.   BMW Group is seeking a permanent injunction for infringement, destruction of products, advertisements, and packaging in TurboSquid’s possession or control bearing BMW Group’s trademarks or... More