the firm's post-grant practitioners are some of the most experienced in the country.

Technologies

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Digital Health
Digital Health
Energy & Renewables
Energy & Renewables

Fast Facts

About Our

Law Firm

About Our Law Firm

Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.

Get to know our

History

Get to know our History

1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.

Our Local and

Global Reach

Our Local and Global Reach

Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.

A few of our

ACCOLADES

A few of our ACCOLADES

Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR

Career

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUR Career

From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.

A few ways to

GET In Touch

A few ways to GET In Touch
US Office

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Learn More +


Tokyo Office

Telephone: +81-3-6212-0550
Learn More +

Downloadable

Patent Forms

Downloadable Patent Forms

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.

Stay informed with

Our Blogs

Update: Louboutin Request for Preliminary Injunction Against Yves Saint Laurent America Denied

  • August 18, 2011
  • Blog Post

Associated Practices


As previously discussed here Christian Louboutin S.A. (“Louboutin”) sought a preliminary injunction to prevent Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. (“YSL”) from marketing any shoes that use the same or a confusingly similar shade of red as that protected by its trademarked red-sole footwear.

The Court denied the request for a preliminary injunction. The judge explained that “[b]ecause in the fashion industry color serves ornamental and aesthetic functions vital to robust competition, the Court finds that Louboutin is unlikely to be able to prove that its red outsole brand is entitled to trademark protection, even if it has gained enough public recognition in the market to have acquired secondary meaning.” You may read the Order at the above link. Further, the Court noted that they would rule in YSL's favor on summary judgment should YSL move to invalidate Louboutin's Red Sole Mark.

The denial of a preliminary injunction permits YSL to continue to market their own red-soled shoes as the case continues.

After the Court’s denial of the preliminary injunction, Louboutin. filed a Notice of Appeal with the U.S. District Court. We will continue to monitor and report on developments in this case.

Resources