Representative Matters

  • Co-Lead Counsel. Represented patentee in L’Oréal v. Neutrogena/Johnson & Johnson Consumer Care and L’Oréal v. MSDCC (Coppertone) in two cases related to sunscreen technology and photostability in the District of Delaware. Both cases settled on favorable terms for client.
  • Co-Lead Counsel. Representing patentee in an action in the Middle District of Florida involving ophthalmic optics technology. Case currently pending.
  • Lead Counsel. Represented patentee in a patent infringement action in the Northern District of Ohio in a case involving acoustic windshield technology. Case settled on favorable terms for client.
  • Lead Counsel. Represented defendant toy manufacturer in a suit brought by a non-practicing entity in the Northern District of Ohio. Case settled on favorable terms for client.
  • Lead Counsel. Represented non-U.S. defendant against a major competitor in the hydrogen gas generator market in a case brought in the District of Delaware. Case settled on favorable terms for client.
  • Lead Counsel. Represented non-US defendant against a major competitor in food processing technology in the District of Hawaii. Case settled on favorable terms for client.
  • Represented patentee in a patent infringement action in the Northern District of Ohio in Saint-Gobain v. Xinyi . The case related to automotive windshields. After a jury trial, the patents were held valid and willfully infringed. Subsequently, double damages and attorney fees were awarded.
  • Represented patentee in a patent infringement action in the District of Delaware in Biacore v. Thermo Bioanalysis in a case related to biosensors. After a bench trial, the patent was held valid and infringed. See, 79 F.Supp2d 422.
  • Represented patentee in a case related to a blowing agent/refrigerant involving a reversal of an earlier summary judgment determination against patentee and clarification of 35 USC 102(g) by the Federal Circuit. See, 622 F.2d 1367. A subsequent jury trial was held.
  • Represented patentee in a unique expedited procedure in the District of Delaware in a case involving steel technology. A subsequent jury trial was held.
  • Represented brand name pharmaceutical manufacturer in case relating to the treatment of AIDS. Summary judgment granted in favor of client.
  • Represented brand name pharmaceutical manufacturer in case relating to the treatment of herpes. Case settled on favorable terms for client.
  • Represented brand name pharmaceutical manufacturer in case relating to the treatment of prostate cancer. Summary judgment granted in favor of client.
  • Represented patentee chemical company in a case relating to the use of monoclonal antibodies in diagnostics. Case settled on favorable terms for client.